CLEARWATER COUNTY TAXPAYERS’ ASSOCIATION ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING - 2021 YEAR IN REVIEW REPORT

By Marianne Cole

Generally this has been a difficult year to maintain and promote our organization due to Covid 19 restrictions. As a result we were only able to hold 4 meetings (March, June, September, and October) before this AGM. In spite of these limited meetings we continued to make an impact in our county. The most notable have been:

Western Star Wrap, January 20, 2021  This very visible, informative wrap gave Clearwater County residents valuable information on the MDP review that many were completely unaware was even taking place. As a result we received:

· 124 written responses in just 10 days, compared to the 62 received by the County during their August-September 2020 input “campaign”.

· Phone calls of concern with the review as well as words of appreciation for our efforts.

· Copies of additional letters written to the County Council expressing concerns with the proposed MDP.

Participation in Virtual MDP Review Meetings in January/February  From my records there were 188 County residents that participated in the 8 meeting for an average of 23.5 per meeting. (Compared to the total of 574 that participated in the 2008-2010 MDP Review meetings.) During those virtual meetings it was clear that there were serious concerns with the new proposed plan.

Attendance at the In-Person/Town Hall MDP Review Meetings in June  At least one member of the CCTA was at each one of those meetings and verified a most dismal attendance at each one. Again we witnessed general strong opposition to the proposed MDP draft, most notably with the increase in sub-divisions to be allowed per quarter.

CCTA Board Meeting with Murray Hagan and Christopher Read  This meeting was held to address our concerns re the following issues noted in our May 30th and June 17th letters to Council. The following issues were discussed:

· MDP Review Process Our concern (supported by the significant requests for such) was the need for more opportunities for public engagement. In our discussion we were told that it is Council’s decision as to how they would like to proceed with the review process. As such it would be up to Council to decide on the value of a survey that we have repeatedly asked for.

· Broadband Our letters had expressed concerns over the accuracy of information being given publicly, the lack of a business plan, and the perceived unwillingness to accept valid information from local ISP’s. In response, during the meeting the following highlights were noted:

Administration has tried to gather helpful information from the ISP’s and while local ones      wanted a joint meeting, the larger “big guys” didn’t.

The high quality of fibre optic cable purchased by the County will last 50 years and it is            better to use quality material as the County needs to be good stewards of taxpayer dollar

The current backbone project will allow for increased use in the future.

The fibre to Nordegg project was originally planned for the last phase of the backbone            project but has been promoted due to an increase in demand.

Connectivity to Olds was justified in order to provide more secure service in case of system  failure with the two current connectivity providers (Telus and the Supernet/Shaw).

The business plan is a work in progress and it is extremely important to Administration. They  are currently working to gather accurate information, but there does seemed to be a bit of a  conflict between Council and Administration on how to proceed.

The MDP Review and Broadband continue to be very important matters that this new Council will have to deal with. As such it is absolutely crucial that:

Council receives the most accurate, unbiased information on all matters.

A variety of methods of gathering information are undertaken with the understanding that many County residents don’t have adequate connectivity and/or are not technologically savvy. It is, however, very important that all County residents be given equal opportunity for input into matters that will ultimately affect them.

The authority given to Council through the Municipal Government Act must be recognized and accepted. Council has duties “to consider the welfare and interests of the municipality as a whole…” (MGA, Section 153.a) and they are “responsible for making sure that the powers, duties, and functions of the municipality are appropriately carried out.” (MGA Section 201.1.b)

We are most thankful to the past Council members for their participation in our meetings along with their helpful information and support. As the next year unfolds, we trust that this spirit of cooperation will continue as we all “work together for the common good.”

IN THE NEWS

By Marianne Cole

Election results 

Special congratulations to our newly elected councillors: Division 1: Gennifer Mehlhaff; Division 2: Sydney Graham; Division 3: Daryl Lougheed; Division 4: Jordan Northcott; Division 5: Neil Ratcliffe; Division 6: Bryan Cermak; Division 7: Michelle Swanson.

At their re-organizational meeting on Monday, October 25th, Daryl Lougheed was elected Reeve and Jordan Northcott, Deputy Reeve.

From comments made during the election campaign as well as during their first council meeting, it seems that our council is very dedicated and enthusiastic about working towards fiscal responsibility and transparency. We wish them the best in their endeavors.

MDP Review 

This item of business will be one of the priority items as the new council begins their duties. It was last discussed by the former council at their September 28, 2021 meeting. At that time the Planning Department presented a summary of the comments they had received and indicated that there was about a 50-50 split among those that supported/those that opposed the MDP draft. This is distinctly different than the break-down of the comments we, as the CCTA, have heard.

Consequently, at our last meeting on October 20th a motion was passed that we complete a FOIP (Freedom of Information & Privacy) request asking for copies of all written comments that the Planning Department had received on this matter. We should be receiving that information by November 20th. We will then review/tabulate those results and report our findings.

Broadband 

Work is progressing on installing fibre optic cable to Ferrier, Nordegg, and down to Sundre. In spite of significant questions about the need for Clearwater County to spend potentially unnecessary dollars to install fibre optic cable all the way to Olds, that work is still continuing as well.

Along with the above work, renovations are also currently underway on a “Point of Presence” building in Rocky. A former workshop in the same yard as the Emergency Services office building is being renovated to be used as a “hub” for broadband operations.

While all this work is being done, there is still no business plan outlining overall costs and potential income/funding from broadband operations. This has been asked for repeatedly by our former council and was mentioned again by the new council at their first meeting on October 26th. Again, the reply was that this financial information is being gathered/worked on and will be available soon.

Leslieville Training Facility

The Leslieville Fire Training Facility was completed late this summer and is pictured here. While the original budget was estimated at $500,000, the 2021 capital budget for this project was $770,000. The costs incurred to date are $613,000. Groundwork still has to be completed and the proposed 2022 draft budget for that is $680,000 but it has yet to be approved by council. $30,000 was recently received from TC Energy in support of this project and talks are continuing with a potential third party contributor. There is approximately $484,000 available in the restricted surplus account to also help cover costs, with the remainder coming from tax revenue.

Historically, our firefighters have gone to a similar facility in Red Deer for training at an approximate cost of $4,800.00 per year. In assessing the value of having our own facility that might have a total construction cost of $1,293,000, it could take 260+ years to recoup those costs, (not including the yearly maintenance) at the yearly Red Deer training rate.

Annual General Meeting 

Our CCTA Annual General Meeting will be held on November 17, 2021 at 7:30PM at the Arbutus Community Hall. We encourage/urge everyone to attend and we would love to welcome new members to our board. An invitation has also been extended to our new council to attend/speak as well. WE HOPE TO SEE YOU THERE.

Coming Events: 

November 17, 2021, 7:30PM, Arbutus Community Hall, Annual General Meeting

January 19, 2022, 7:30PM, Regular Monthly Meeting

IN THE NEWS

By Marianne Cole

Municipal Election 

As you are all likely aware, the Municipal Election will be held on Monday, October 18, 2021. Consequently, this issue of the Beacon is featuring thoughts by our local candidates. A brief questionnaire was sent to each one and we send special thanks to the following candidates that submitted their replies. Regretfully we did not hear from Curt Maki in Division 3, Bob Bryant in Division 5, and Shane Nafziger in Division 6. As we are publishing all those we did receive, as they were written, this month’s Beacon is a bit longer than usual. We trust you will enjoy their comments and strongly urge you to pass on the information----and please remember to vote.

DIVISION 1 REPLIES

Introductions:

Genny Mehlhaff: It has been a pleasure to live in Clearwater County for almost 20 years and I love it here. I am a proud 5th generation farmer working with my husband on our ranch with our 4 children here in the beautiful eastern slopes. My rural roots have ensured I have a solid work ethic and sound family values. I have volunteered and worked in emergency services most of my life; starting in the fire service, a short period in law enforcement, and I am currently a part-time primary care paramedic. I look forward to the opportunity to use my knowledge, skills, and experience to ensure our community is prosperous and maintains our wholesome country lifestyles.

Nicole Stewart: I was born and raised in Rocky and am now raising my 3 children here in Division 1 of Clearwater County. My husband and I both run a small business. I started in Healthcare and now I own and operate a small center that provides a number of services to the public.

What prompted you to run for County Council?

Genny Mehlhaff: I have been interested in local municipal governance for quite some time. I started by getting involved with several municipal boards over the last several years including: Health Professionals Engagement team, Municipal Planning Commission, Land Care, and I currently chair the Ag Services Board. These experiences have provided me with a greater understanding of the roles and responsibilities of a Councillor. I feel that l is a great way to get involved with government on a direct level affecting out local community and microsystem at its core. I want to show my children that you can have a positive impact on your community in so many ways, and that getting involved is how you maintain our community’s strength and vitality. Whether it be volunteering for our local search and rescue team, 4H club, team sports, or governance, all parts of the system are needed for success.

Nicole Stewart: What prompted me to run was my passion for service to my division as well as a need for change and new perspective.

What is the most important issues you feel council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

Genny: Council has an immense job and responsibility ahead. There is no sugar coating it: economical stability is a necessity. Financial responsibility and planning for the future are vital while understanding that solid agreements will solidify needed partnerships, ensuring our friends and neighbours needs are not only met but expectations exceeded. We need to complete the Municipal Development Plan and Land Use Bylaw in a way that makes sense to secure a clear path forward. The MDP and LUB are the framework for all land decisions and considering the diversity of the municipality that we all love so much. It is essential we get them right.

Thank you so much for the opportunity to answer your questions and as always, I look forward to an open dialog and welcome your insights.

Nicole: I think the most important issue is creating and maintaining healthy relationships with residents, other local governing bodies as well as other communities.

DIVISION 2 REPLIES

Introduction: 

Hello, I am Sydney Graham and I am very pleased to introduce myself as a Division 2 Clearwater County Council candidate. I was raised a fifth generation farmer here in Clearwater County. I have deep roots in the county and I have always been very involved with our community whether it has been through 4-Hwhen I participated in the program or giving back through volunteering. While working for the county for a number of years and running my small business with my husband, I have had the opportunity to get to know all of the corners of our county and some of the wonderful people in it.

What prompted you to run for County Council?

 My biggest inspiration to run for council is my late Grandfather, “Gerald Kujala. Watching him while I was growing up, being a hard working farmer who always took care of his family but also gave back to the community through his service has pushed me to want to do the same. In my years working for the county, I have developed such a fondness for our region and the people in it. I have also acquired knowledge and skills that would be a huge asset to have sitting on council. I want to create the best county possible.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years? 

Although there are many important issues I believe council needs to focus on, my largest concern is rural security. Online I see daily, vehicles that have gone missing, attempted break and enters and much more criminal behaviour occurring. I would like to get back to a place where people don’t lock their door when they leave home and leave their keys in their vehicles. I believe that we need to dedicate more time and resources to improve the safety in our county for our families and businesses.

Introduction: 

Cammie Laird. I am seeking re-election as your Councillor for Division 2. I value our community and the people; your viewpoints are appreciated, relevant and vital in defining opportunities for what really matters in building our shared future. Clearwater County has been our family’s home for over 18 years. I have learned much about the home I treasure, the amazing people who live and work here and the services we enjoy. I believe in lifelong learning and striving for constant improvement. My “Can Do” service attitude will continue to provide me with a firm foundation for building a bright future for all. What I offer is compassion, tolerance, dedication, commitment, hard work, and the ability to work with other collaboratively.

What prompted you to run for County Council?

 I have had the privilege to represent Clearwater County for the past 4 years as your Division 2 Councillor and while it hasn’t always been easy, it has been extremely rewarding. We continue to face many challenges to meet the needs, without sacrificing the welfare of future generations. I would like the opportunity to continue that work and build a vibrant community together. I know I have what it takes to make a difference.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 County viability and sustainability. Understanding community needs and priorities and preserving necessary services will be more important than ever for Council to consider, with an uncertain tax base. Council will need to balance budget and needs, while managing precious resources with common sense solutions. We will need to consider reasonable approaches to preserving valuable agricultural landbase. With the completion of the Regional Governance Study and findings indicating that the County and the Village of Caroline should explore amalgamation, it will be vital for both municipalities to consider best methods to move forward. Furthermore, Council should be championing project that strengthen our community’s future and promoting healthy relationships with our neighboring municipalities so all can thrive.

Introduction: 

Dick Wymenga. My wife and I live near Leslieville where we have a cow-calf and grain farm. We are community supporters by our involvement with the Leslieville Hall and the local Ag Society. We have been involved in many agricultural organizations including 4-H beef, Alberta Beef Producers, and Alberta Barley Commission. We have also been involved with the Educational Ag Tour that the Grade 4 students have taken as presenters for many years. This education of students is most important as they and their families have been removed from the farm for many generations.

What prompted you to run for County Council? 

I believe Council needs to change direction on policy.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 I believe having accessibility to High Speed internet to all county residents at an affordable cost is important. Also renewing the Municipal Development Plan and protecting agricultural farm land is equally important. We need to renew a healthy working relationship with the town of Rocky Mountain House as well.

DIVISION 3 REPLIES

Introduction: 

My name is Daryl Lougheed and I am seeking re-election in Division 3. I operate the family farm at Condor along with my wife Penni and daughter Grace. I live in the greatest place!

What prompted you to run for County Council?

 Community service has been a huge part of my (and my family’s) life. The challenge of working with others to provide a better, safer, and more supportive community has remained a passion of mine throughout my lifetime. Serving on council has enabled me to continue this work at another level and understand more deeply how privileged we are to live here.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 I believe we need to continue to focus on economic development over the next 4 years. We all seek prosperity, security, the enjoyment of our lifestyle, and the strengthening of our safe community. Focusing on our pillars of agriculture, natural resources, and connectivity will be key in that endeavor.

DIVISION 4 REPLIES

Introduction: 

My name is Naomi McNair and I am running for Division 4 County Councillor. Becoming a county councillor has been on my radar for almost five years. I have chosen to run in this municipal election because more and more I recognize the need for everyone to step up and do their part. I believe that I have the strengths, experiences, personality, and time to do this job well.

What prompted you to run for County Council? 

As a councillor, my aims would be for open accountability, respectful dialogue, healthy growth and sound stewardship. I come with no specific agenda, but a desire to ensure that residents’ voices are heard, that wise decisions continue to be made and to see Clearwater County continue to grow, prosper, a further it reputation as a destination spot.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 There are always hot topics and areas of concern, and I look forward to hearing from division residents on how to address key issues and brainstorm together to find sustainable, healthy, and equitable solutions. If you have further inquiries, please contact me via email; gnmcmair@gmail.com.

Introduction: 

My name is Jordan Northcott. I’m a life-long resident who grew up on a dairy farm in the Caroline area. Besides my passion for farming, I have worked all my life in the oilfield.

What prompted you to run for County Council? 

The reason I decided to run for county council is that I’ve been disappointed with the elected people in all levels of government for a long time and have always thought that someone would come along and fix things in the government but no one has. I often think is this the best we have for people in federal, provincial, and municipal governments and in the past elections the candidates have sometimes won by acclamation. I’ done waiting and know I can do a better job!

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 The most important things over the next four years will be to use common sense and try to ensure council makes responsible decisions.

Introduction: 

My name is Tim Plante and I was born in Rocky and raised here and lived here most of my life. My family and I live on our farm between Rocky and Caroline where we raise our four daughters and run a small business dealing with septic trucks and steamers. I have experience while serving many boards and committees in and around our community. I was a paid on call firefighter for CRFRS for just over 6 years at Station 30 (Caroline).

What prompted you to run for County Council? 

What prompted me to put my name forward for County Council in my division was simply: it’s time for change. I believe the broadband project is extremely important but where I cannot support it is fiber to the home is a horrid expense that we cannot afford. It would be a waste of our tax dollars to try and do that for every home in the county. Not to mention the technology sector changes so fast that by the time you get finished one thing it’s already outdated. Although I believe something needs to be done, I am in support of the backbone project and then localized towers and working with ISPs to get the serviced to all the homes in the county. I also think it’s going to take some new faces both on Town and County Council to try and get the relationship strengthened and as a team cooperating together again.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 Some of the hot topic items I think we are going to have to deal with this term is finalizing the Municipal Development Plan, seniors’ housing in Caroline area, and encouraging growth in the community. I believe our area should be not just an area people like to come and visit, but a place they would want to settle down and live and work as well. I believe that the approach the consultant took with the MDP was flawed in many ways but the main thing that I just cannot be content with is the chopping up and subdividing of good farmland. I see the need for more parcels of land in the future but the farmable land index number needs to come into play. It’s a lot different subdividing and chopping up land that is just Bush and Hills Pasture land than it is for perfectly good crop Fields.

I hope on October 18th everyone gets out and does their democratic duty. I would respectfully appreciate your consideration if you live in Division 4.

Introduction: 

My name is John Vandermeer. I am a third generation Clearwater County resident with a broad background. I have lived and worked in the USA, Europe, and Asia before returning to my roots as a farmer northeast of Caroline. I bring planning, technical, operational, managerial, and relationship building skills to the role of Councillor for Division 4.

What prompted you to run for County Council? 

My goal is to continue to work with you to make sure we have the best possible infrastructure and policies so you, your family, and your business can succeed.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 We need economic development, modern infrastructure, a workable land use policy, good relations with other municipalities and no tax increases.

Two important ingredients for economic development are developable land and quality, affordable internet service.

The negotiations with Caroline on amalgamation and Seniors’ housing need to be concluded as a win-win for everyone. Our relations with the town of Rocky Mountain House need to be enhanced and we will continue to work with other municipalities in central Alberta (Central Alberta Economic Partnership) to bring business and jobs to the area.

We can do what must be done with no tax increases to our residents.

I suggest a plebiscite offering citizens the opportunity to select the Reeve (Mayor) for a 4-year term. The rotating Reeve approach of the last 4a years has not served our community well. Consistency and relationships are important.

I ask for your vote on October 18th. Contact me at: (403) 844-9286 or email: johnvan@telus.net

DIVISION 5 REPLIES

Introduction: 

My name is Nick Frank and I am running for Division 5. My formal education is in Recreation, Tourism, Community Development, Emergency Management and Public Security. I have been blessed to support volunteers in Nordegg with the transition of the outdoor recreation centre located at the community hall. This was completed through corporate donations, grants, and volunteer supports. I am a firm believer in community engagement and success through collaboration.

What prompted you to run for County Council? 

Through volunteering on many community projects, I learned that there is a sizable disconnect between the needs and aspiration of taxpayers and the regional orientation of “Clearwater County. In addition, bad faith seems to have developed between Clearwater County and the local municipalities of Rocky Mountain House and Caroline. Finally, the relationship with the Government of Alberta has not been optimized. I want to use my skills in localizing needs assessment, maximizing local strengths, conflict resolution and negotiation to help realign these relationships. The goal would be to develop an environment that attracts investors, investor confidence and ultimately increases the tax base, allowing for services to increase while holding the line on tax assessments or possibly reducing taxes.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 There is an overarching need to balance the current strong regional approach of Clearwater County with investing in local community strengths. This larger goal could be approached through balancing the strong existing bureaucracy with attention to local needs, and through balancing excessive regional control with partnering to create opportunity. This rebalancing would stimulate prosperity for Clearwater County. Contact: Phone: (403) 506-7744. Email: nickfrankdivision5@gmail.com website: https://nickfrankdivision5.ca/ Facebook; https://www/facebook.com/NickFrankClearwaterCounty

Introduction: 

My name is Neil Ratcliffe and I am running for Division 5. We moved here 20 years ago after a career in oil and gas telecommunications. My abilities as a trouble shooter and problem solver have served me well. Participation in the Ferrier Community as well as CPAC and Crime Watch strengthened my conviction on the importance of strong communities.

What prompted you to run for County Council?

 People who know my capabilities and recognized my dedication as a community builder convinced me that more could be accomplished from being on Council.

Individual counsellors have very little power on their own. I encourage people to look for someone who creates consensus rather than conflict. Councillors should feel an obligation to serve the communities’ interests over their own. They should be approachable, open minded and seek other opinions instead of making decisions based only on their own experience. They should work for the common good and stand up for it when they must. Accountability is important.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 My decision to run for County Council is not about me. It is about the long term sustainability and quality of life in our Community. With Covid measures in place, I have enjoyed talking to a lot of people about their concerns. They tell me that the two most important issues are broadband and spending. I will devote most of my energies there but also to appropriate development in the West Country. I can be reached by e-mail at neilr4div5@gmail.com or by phone at (403)845-5745.

DIVISION 6 REPLIES

Introduction: 

My name is Bryan Cermak. I was raised on a farm in Clearwater County and have worked in the oil and gas industry until my retirement. We now reside on a farm in the Crammond area.

What prompted you to run for County Council? 

I’m a strong believer in government transparency and accountability and if elected I would do everything in my power to ensure the best interests of all residents of Clearwater County are being met.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 I want the County to remain sustainable for future generations and with the down turn in the economy and oil industry it will be difficult to do. We need to balance the budget without dipping into reserves.

Introduction: 

My name is Tim Hoven and I have lived in Clearwater County on our family farm for almost all my life. My wife, Lorianne, and our children have been farming full-time since 1996. I am passionate about agriculture and growing healthy soils on our farm. We have been selling our beef direct to consumers for over 20 years. Our farm has been in the family for over 110 years and we hope to have future generations of the Hoven family continue the farm.

What prompted you to run for County Council?

 I am running for Council because I want to make sure that this place we call home is in good shape for future generations. I hope that one of my children wants to take over the family farm and I am doing my part to make sure that the county stays in good financial health, provides good, adequate services to residents, and keeps our taxes as low as possible.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 The biggest immediate issue for the County is the proposed Fibre to the Home internet plan. Fibre to the Home internet has the potential to cost the county upwards of $120-140million dollars as it puts the fibre network in the ground. This has the potential to drain the reserves that the county has spent 30 years building up. The draft business plan that was prepared a few years ago showed that this project could lose money every single year that it is operating and never be profitable. As new technologies are invented, such as satellite internet companies like Starlink and its future competitors, the fibre to the home project will be unable to compete as the network is far too costly to build and operate for a county the size of Clearwater County. This could be the biggest waste of money in the history of the county.

DIVISION 7 REPLIES

Introduction: 

Hello Clearwater County friends and neighbors. My name is JoLynn Bradshaw and I am running for Division 7 Councillor. As a 28-year resident of Clearwater County who loves our large and beautiful home, I want to serve my fellow residents by getting to know their concerns and representing them in Council.

What prompted you to run for County Council? 

My desire to run for County Council was sparked by this question to myself, “What can I do with my time that will best serve the people in my community and put me in a position to bring positive things into the lives of the people here?” I believe sitting on Council will enable me to do just that.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 In listening to the residents, which I will hold as top priority if elected, I am hearing that the issues of the Municipal Development Plan and broadband are their major concerns at present. If elected, it would be my mandate to gather the information and represent what the majority wishes are on these matters and all concerns of the people who make their lives in Clearwater County.

Thank you folks for reading about all the candidates and helping to build our community.

Introduction: 

My name is Michelle Swanson and I’m proud to say Clearwater County has been my family’s home for the last 16 years. I’m a local farmer, host “on-farm” stays and I’ an enthusiastic community volunteer. I am seeking re-election for Division 7 Councillor.

What prompted you to run for County Council?

 For the last four years, I have been dedicated, and remain committed, to working hard on building a better future for the residents in Clearwater County. I accept the continued accessibility and accountability for keeping all constituents informed through honest conversations and advocating for your priorities in council with fairness and respect.

What is the most important issue you feel Council needs to focus on in the next 4 years?

 The increasing attractiveness of our region will continue to bring added demands for a variety of developments. The balance between economic growth and protecting rural livelihoods (agriculture and agri-business) will need up-to-date guiding policies while ensuring the fiscal sustainability of our county is not compromised for future generations.

It’s been my privilege to serve all constituents in Clearwater County. To contact me, call (403) 844-3222. Email: swansonrockymtn@gmail.com Or FB page: Clearwater County Division 7 Candidate Michelle Swanson.

COMING EVENTS: 

Wednesday, October 20, 2021, 7:30PM, Arbutus Community Hall, Regular Monthly Meeting;

Wednesday, November 17, 2021, 7:00PM, Arbutus Community Hall Annual General Meeting

IN THE NEWS

By Marianne Cole

Municipal Development Plan Review 

A total of 10 “Town Hall”/in-person meetings were held in Caroline, Rocky Mtn. House, Leslieville, and Nordegg at the end of June. Even though people had the options to attend morning, afternoon, or evening meetings in each of the above locations (except for Nordegg’s only afternoon meeting), the attendance was very disappointing with less than 100 in total.

The most notable topic of concern focussed on the proposed increase in allowable “parcels out” per quarter, along with the accompanying lack of restriction on sub-division size.

As with the virtual meetings that had been held earlier in the winter, there was general opposition to the new proposals. Most commonly the opposition was supported by concerns over loss of valuable farmland, the potential resulting increase in price of farmland, and the consequential negative impact on farming operations.

It has become particularly noticeable this summer the very real value of hay production and grazing opportunities here in Clearwater County while the serious drought is being felt more extensively elsewhere. The beneficial impact of production on our farmland has certainly been far-reaching this year.

A full report on the MDP review is expected to be released in September and will definitely be an important task for Council following the election.

Regional Governance Study 

Meetings were recently held in Caroline, Leslieville, Rocky and Nordegg to inform residents on the results of the study done earlier on regional governance and the possibility of County/town/village amalgamation. Once more, public attendance was unfortunately dismal. Generally, the study suggested that County/Caroline amalgamation could be positive and was supported by area residents. Conversely, County/town of Rocky amalgamation received a more negative response. We will keep you posted on any further news on this matter.

Upcoming Municipal Elections 

As you are likely aware, municipal elections are being held on Monday, October 18, 2021. A significant change this year is that in order for County residents to be eligible to vote, they MUST REGISTER. This can be done in three ways: 1. Go on line to www.clearwatercounty.ca/elections; 2. Phone the County office at (403) 845-4444; 3. Stop in at the County office.

Nominations for candidates are open until Monday, September 20, 2021. Currently the candidates seeking election are as follows: (Note: The current councillors are in parenthesis.)

Division 1: (Jim Duncan) Gennifer Mehlhaff, Nicole Stewart 

Division 2: (Cammie Laird) Cammie Laird 

Division 3: (Daryl Lougheed) Daryl Lougheed 

Divison 4: (John Vandermeer) Naomi McNair, Jordan Northcott, Tim Plante 

Division 5: (Theresa Laing) Nick Frank, Neil Ratcliffe 

Division 6: (Tim Hoven) Bryan Cermak, Shane Nafziger 

Division 7: (Michelle Swanson) Jo-Lynn Bradshaw, Michelle Swanson

The CCTA will be hosting a Candidates’ Forum on Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 7:00PM at the Leslieville Community Hall. We strongly urge you to attend and hear how the candidates plan to serve you in the next 4 years.

Leslieville Community Block Party 

The Leslieville Community Association is organizing a Block Party for Saturday, September 18, 2021 from 11:00AM to 3:00PM in the Community Hall and the street outside the hall. It will feature fun activities for the kids as well as an opportunity for community organizations to have tables/venues to promote their operations. The CCTA will be hosting a table where we can inform people about our work and hopefully attract some new members.

COMING EVENTS:

Wednesday, September 15, 2021, 7:30PM, Arbutus Community Hall, Regular Monthly CCTA Meeting. 

Saturday, September 18, 2021, 11:00AM – 3:00PM Leslieville Community Block Party.

Thursday, October 7, 2021, 7:00PM, Leslieville Community Hall, Municipal Election Candidates’ Forum 

Monday, October 18, 2021, Municipal Election. MAKE SURE YOU REGISTER TO VOTE PRIOR TO. 

Wednesday, October 2021, 7:30PM, Arbutus Community Hall, Regular Monthly CCTA Meeting.

IN THE NEWS

By Marianne Cole

MDP Review 

In the CAO’s report presented at the May 25th council meeting, it was noted that the MDP Steering Committee (which includes all council members) met, in camera, on May 14th to discuss further process options. The following suggestions were made:

· Small in-person meetings (@ 15 attendees) could be held in 4 locations across the county, potentially in June/July.

· There could potentially be two rounds of meetings with multiple sessions held per day (morning, afternoon, evening).

· Pre-registration would be required and no repeat attendance would be allowed.

· The anticipated number of attendees might range from 180 to 360 people. (Note: This is about 3.6% of our county population.)

· While Council anticipates a meeting in August to review comments and decide on revisions, the MDP review may not be completed before the 2021 municipal elections this fall.

It is interesting to note that two letters on this matter were included in the May 25th meeting agenda. One was from Century 21 and the other from the Rocky Chamber of Commerce. Both promoted improved internet/technology capabilities as well as land use changes such as increasing acreage sizes along with the allowable number per quarter.

The CCTA has also written a letter suggesting that the County send out a survey to all county residents/landowners with information about the MDP review in order to provide equal opportunity for all to have input into this important document that could affect everyone. No response to this suggestion has been received.

Broadband Update 

In his verbal report at the Council meeting, Interim CAO Murray Hagan noted that Council’s Broadband workshop on May 21st had been “worthwhile” and that feedback from the ISP’s (Internet Service Providers) had been “helpful”. No further information was given verbally or in the written report as to what the ISP’s had actually indicated about the project.

It was also noted at the Council meeting that the “Point of Presence” (POP) facility in Rocky will be ready in September/October. This facility will house the broadband project operations. It is interesting to note that Supernet’s operation works out of a single room in Calgary while serving a whole province.

While fibre optic cable installation to Ferrier (Phase 1 of the county’s 6 step projects) is complete, no information is being given to the ISP’s on connectivity procedures/costs. This is definitely needed so that use could begin and the county could get some of their money back.

Regional Governance 

Study This was the survey/study, initiated by the town, on the possibility of town/county/village of Caroline amalgamation. Originally the timeline indicated that a report would be released in April. When no information had been released by mid-May, I contacted the consultant in charge of the study. He indicated that the report had be publicized on the Regional Governance Study website on April 16th. I’m not sure how many people check out ccregionalgovernancestudy.ca on a regular basis, so how were we to even know a report had been published?? Nothing on the matter has been mentioned in local media.

In reviewing the 67 page document the following highlights were noted:

· 462 people took active part in the online open house, survey, and on-line learning session (out of @17,000 town and county residents).

· Of those, 73% were residents or landowners in Clearwater County. (Were those numbers due to the wrap that the CCTA did in the Western Star?????)

· Generally, the majority were opposed to any idea of amalgamating with the town.

The next step in the process is for County Council to review/discuss the report in camera, before more information will be publicly released, likely later in June.

Resumption of CCTA Meetings

With the province’s easing of Covid restrictions we will be having our regular June meeting on Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 7:30PM at the Arbutus Community Hall.

COMING EVENTS: Regular meeting, Wednesday, June 16, 2021.

IN THE NEWS

By Marianne Cole

2021 Tax Rate

 At their April 27th meeting, Councillors unanimously passed a motion to maintain a 0% tax rate increase for 2021. During an informative discussion it was noted that with lower assessments county taxpayers should see a small decrease in their tax bills. An unknown factor would be the school requisition which is determined by the province.

Another very positive move came from a motion made by Councillor Lougheed to have administration gather information on a potential rebate that could be given to taxpayers. The money for that could come from the tax rate stabilization reserves which currently sit at $12, 898, 394. Further information will be presented to Council at their May 11th meeting. Let’s hope this new rebate idea gets official ratification at that time.

MDP Review 

At the April 13th meeting, by a vote of 4-3, Council defeated a motion made by Councillor Vandermeer to postpone the Municipal Development Plan Review until such time as Covid restrictions would be eased and in-person meetings could be held. This was a very strong request put forward on the survey done by the CCTA in the Western Star in February as well as during the virtual/on-line meetings held at that time. Interestingly, at the MDP Review Committee meeting held on March 13th, the committee (made up of all councillors) favored postponing the review. Now, one month later, when an official motion is made, 4 councillors (Duncan, Laird, Laing, and Swanson) voted against the postponement.

As explained by Planning the next step is for them to review the original draft along with public comments made, and make changes as suggested. They will then bring that draft back to Council for review and 1st reading. That will be followed by a public hearing in some way and then 2nd and 3rd reading could take place. The timeline for all this could be May---July.

In order for Council to have valid, verifiable information on the support for/opposition to the most contentious issue of subdivisions, the CCTA has written a letter suggesting that a survey on the matter be included with the tax notices to be sent out shortly. This would allow all taxpayers equal opportunity to voice their opinion and it is hoped that the results would then guide Council’s decisions.

Solid Waste Disposal Cards 

As most of you likely know, as of June 1st all county residents will require a special card in order to drop off waste at their regional landfills. Landowners can get for 2 free cards while renters will need to pay $35.00 for their cards. In questioning that difference, it was explained that landowners already support the operation of waste disposal services through the property taxes they pay.

As for other waste disposal matters, most notably questions/concerns about the future of the now closed, formerly joint-use facility in town, I was told that “discussions are on-going”. We will keep you posted on any happenings there.

ICF Agreement 

On April 23, 2021, Clearwater County and the Town of Rocky Mtn. House finally approved their Inter-municipal Collaboration Framework. This is a document, mandated by the province, that stipulates how the two jurisdictions will work together on planning and jointly used services. While the county had easily signed agreements with all their other neighbors, it took quite some time to come to an agreement with the town.

At the same time a new Community Support Service Agreement was also signed. This mandates that for the next 5 years, the county will pay the town $406, 644 yearly to cover infrastructure costs. That figure was reached following careful calculation of the value of the tax-exempt properties that both municipalities have within the other’s jurisdiction. This new agreement replaces the former long-standing agreement that the county would pay the town $750,000 annually for general operating costs. We certainly commend the county negotiating team/council on their diligence in developing this new agreement.

May Smiles 

Why should you start a gardening business??? To rake in the cash.

What kind of garden did the baker have??? A flour garden.

Why did the gardener bury all her money??? To make her soil rich.

Coming Events: 

Currently uncertain due to Covid Restrictions, but we hope to have a regular monthly meeting on Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 7:30PM at the Arbutus Community Hall. Everyone welcome.

IN THE NEWS

By Marianne Cole

Municipal Development Plan Review 

The MDP review process has been temporarily paused. We will keep you posted with any further news as it becomes available.

Regional Governance 

The first efforts on public engagement regarding town/county/village amalgamation have now been completed. A virtual meeting was held on February 17th and then people had until March 10th to submit their survey responses on the matter. As the consultants had done a very poor job of putting out information on the matter, the CCTA put together a wrap around the March 3rd issue of the Western Star. It outlined the potential impacts of joining the local municipalities under one jurisdiction. We heard very positive comments about this effort to give county residents more valuable information on such an important issue.

66 surveys were handed in to the county office and it is unknown how many were handed in to the town and village, or how many were submitted on line. A report is now being prepared by the consultants and we hope to hear those results in April.

Up-Coming Tax Rate 

Significant discussion took place at the March 17th CCTA meeting on the up-coming tax rate. As a result, a motion was passed that we write a letter to County Council asking for a reduction in the tax rate, as well as a potential rebate on taxes for businesses in the county. We are well aware of the reduced income that the county currently receives due to the down-turn in the oil industry, but county residents and businesses are also being impacted financially by the economy and Covid. Reduced taxes could potentially result in a community benefit.

We also requested council direct administration to practise as much fiscal restraint/efficiency as possible.

Another concern expressed at the meeting was related to our current reserves. There is a worry that the province will look at our significant reserves (current overall total of $106, 778, 399) and subsequently reduce their normal financial support.

Following our meeting I did some research to compare our finances with those of two of our neighboring jurisdictions. The chart below shows some of the more interesting highlights. Compared to others, we can perhaps be thankful for the prudent operation of our council and administration. We trust that it will continue with the current budget and subsequent tax rate.

INTERESTING FINANCIAL COMPARISONS

Category                     Neighbor 1                          Clearwater County                  Neighbor 2

1. 2019 Revenue         $29, 527, 880                     $56, 751,795                            $62, 342, 757

2. 2019 Expenses        $31, 992, 315                     $52, 163, 359                           $79, 140, 676

3. Surplus/Deficit        $2, 464, 435                       $4, 588, 436                             $16, 797, 919

4. Accumulated

surplus/reserves           $43, 310, 314                    $106, 778, 399                         $52, 380, 944

5. Reeve/mayor

remuneration &

benefits total                $97, 416                            $63, 640                                   $102, 739

6. Average of

councillor

remuneration/

benefits                       $57, 675                             $52, 182                                   $67, 348

Population 

comparisons:              7, 770                                  11, 900                                     19, 500

Note: The 2020 figures are not yet available. The audited financial statements are usually presented the end of April/beginning of May.

Change of Meeting Date 

Due to the up-coming Blue Mountain Power Corp.’s annual meeting being set for the same date as our regular monthly meeting, we are moving or next meeting to one week earlier. It will be held on Wednesday, April 14, 2021 at 7:30PM at the Arbutus Community Hall. Everyone is welcome and social distancing is in effect.

UP-COMING EVENTS:

Regular monthly meetings: Wednesday, April 14, 2021; Wednesday, May 19, 2021 7:30PM, Arbutus Community Hall

Easter Smiles:

How do you catch a unique Easter Bunny? Unique up on it.

Why shouldn’t you tell an Easter egg a joke? Because it might crack up.

Why did the Easter egg hide? He was a little chicken.

IN THE NEWS

By Marianne Cole

REGIONAL GOVERNANCE STUDY 

This issue of our CCTA newsletter will focus on one main topic---the Regional Governance Study currently underway. In short, this is a preliminary investigation into the various possibilities of government for the County, the Town of Rocky, and the Village of Caroline.

History

Discussion on this issue began a couple of years ago when potential “amalgamation” was first proposed by the town. The three councils each discussed the matter and it seemed that the most favorable/beneficial option for the county was to just investigate joining the County and the Village of Caroline. It was felt that taking one small step first and evaluating those results before proceeding with a larger step would be the wisest choice. This suggestion was communicated to both the Town and Village. The Village was supportive; the Town not. The County and Village subsequently applied for an Alberta Community Partnership Grant to support costs of investigating just the dual amalgamation. Initially the grant was refused but was later awarded for a reduced amount.

In the meantime, the Town submitted an application under the same program with the intent of doing a “regional” study, even though both the County and the Village had indicated they did not support the idea. Their application was successful and the investigation process has now begun with a regional focus.

Process 

A Steering Committee to oversee the process was established with the Mayors of the town and village, the County Reeve, Councillors from all three jurisdictions, and the CAO’s from each municipality. Applications were opened up for consultants to do the information gathering and report preparation. As a result Nichols Applied Management along with ISL Engineering and Land Services have been hired. They have released the following timeline and steps:

January: Review the current situation and conduct interviews with the respective councils and administration.

February: Public engagement that would include providing online information, doing a virtual (online) open house meeting, and conducting a survey.

March-May: Develop options and recommendations based on the background review and the public engagement feedback. Submit a report to the Steering Committee.

May: Hopefully hold in-person open houses, virtual open house, and complete another survey. A summary of the feedback would then be shared with the Steering Committee.

Following the information gathering and presentation to the Steering Committee it is up to the three councils to make further decisions.

Possibilities 

While there are seven possibilities listed in the “Regional Governance Study” information there are in reality 5 options:

1. Status Quo Everything remains the same with collaborative regional partnerships.

2. Single Municipal District The three municipalities (County, village, and town) would amalgamate into one single Municipal District.

3. Dissolution of the Village Caroline would give up its status as a village to become a hamlet in Clearwater County (like Leslieville or Condor). This would leave the County and the town as separate entities.

4. Amalgamation of County and Village This would be similar to the above option but electoral divisions in the County would be adjusted to give Caroline its own representation on County Council.

5. Amalgamation of the Town and County The town of Rocky and Clearwater County would be joined into a single Municipal District. An electoral system would need to be developed to elect one council. Staff would be consolidated into a single administration. Caroline would maintain its status as a village.

COMMENT 

This is a very crucial issue that commands significantly more information be given to the public in methods other than the over-dependence on social media/virtual technology. To rely so heavily on this method of public engagement shows, again, a definite lack of understanding of/respect for, the rural community and its issues with connectivity and variety of technology skill set.

All residents of each one of the 3 municipalities involved deserve equal opportunity to gather information and provide input. This can only be done effectively if information has been provided in a number of ways that would address any possible restrictions. While open, in-person meetings are viewed as most desired, other effective methods could include individual information mail outs that would include a survey, as well as a potential wrap around the most widely circulated newspaper in our area, the Western Star.

Many of us have witnessed the recent distinct friction between the Town and County with a perceived unwillingness by the Town for equal “give and take”. It was earlier evident in the frustrating discussions between the Town and the Rodeo Board re the grandstand grant/ North Saskatchewan River Park lease. Recently, other conflicting issues (such as waste disposal and airport matters) have come forward. Such discord has, historically, not been a problem between the Town and County. In spite of these problems, the County has remained committed to fulfilling its community support financially. In 2019 this amounted to $7,808,079. The 2020 total has yet to be audited/published.

With an election on the horizon perhaps there is a possibility that we could return to more congenial, cooperative negotiations on matters of joint concern. As such we should not now be forced into a situation that could potentially have very serious repercussions to, above all, our County finances.

LET’S PUT ANY THOUGHTS OF AMALGAMATION ON HOLD AND SEE WHAT THE FUTURE BRINGS. IN THE MEANTIME, PLEASE COMPLETE THAT ATTACHED SURVEY… AND EVEN PHOTOCOPY IT AND PASS IT ON TO YOUR FRIENDS. 

The deadline for submission has been extended to March 10, 2021.

Coming Events: 

Wednesday, March 17, 2021, 7:30PM, Arbutus Community Hall, Regular CCTA monthly meeting

IN THE NEWS

By Marianne Cole

CCTA Wrap and Survey Results 

As a result of comments we had heard about the lack of knowledge of the County’s Municipal Development Review process, the CCTA decided to put a “wrap” around the January 20th issue of the Western Star. In it we highlighted proposed changes to the current MDP, most notably increasing the number of allowable parcels out of a quarter, dropping the size restrictions on those parcels, and putting gravel extraction permit applications under a Direct Control District. We received very positive comments about our efforts to inform people. In addition to providing this information we also included a survey on people’s ideas of public engagement in this process. Amazingly, we received 124 responses before the January 31 deadline. From those responses the most notable results were:

78 people had not heard of the review process prior to publication of the wrap.

107 said they were not satisfied with either the amount of information they had received or the opportunity to have input.

98 thought in-person meetings were the best method of public engagement.

112 wanted the process delayed until meetings could be held.

The top three most noted comments focussed on the need to protect agricultural land, worries about increasing farmer/acreage owner conflict, and a questionable review process with heavy reliance on social media to provide/gather information.

The CCTA sincerely thanks everyone who took the time to complete the survey. The results will be published in the February 10th issue of the Western Star and we will also be sharing them with County Council.

County’s Virtual MDP Review Meetings 

In an effort to provide opportunity for public engagement on the Municipal Development Plan Review, the County hosted 8 “virtual” (on your computer) meetings between January 25th and Thursday, February 4th, with approximately 180 people joining in. Attendance averaged in the 20’s per meeting and went from a low of 12 to a high of 56 at the last meeting. (This compares to a total of 574 participants in 19 in-person meetings during the 2010 MDP Review. This certainly supports a common frustration we have heard regarding the fact that virtual meetings cannot be accessed by many in Clearwater County.)

Each meeting began with Craig Teal, a consultant from Parkland Community Planning Services in Red Deer giving a presentation on the key parts of the proposed plan followed by open discussions. There was absolutely great participation from several of our young farmers whose concerns focussed mainly on the negative impacts of farming by increasing subdivision opportunities. There was also significant concern/questions related to the process, along with a desire to delay matters until in-person meetings could be held. Certainly there was some support for the changes and they were voiced as well.

Going forward, the County’s Planning Department will prepare a summary of the information, present it to council, and then it will be up to Council to accept the document as is, make changes, or delay the process until in-person meetings can be held. We will keep you posted!!!

Regional Waste Management 

As many of you likely are aware, the Rocky Transfer Station has now been closed. According to a news release posted on the County’s website, “Clearwater County, the Town of Rocky Mountain House and the Village of Caroline have mutually agreed that the Rocky Mountain Regional Solid Waste Authority (RMRSWA) was not meeting the respective needs of each municipality. As a result, the RMRSWA is being dissolved and the Rocky Transfer Station will be permanently closed, effective January 31, 2021.”

As a replacement, a temporary transfer station has been set up on the County’s property near the airport north of town for county use and the town has its new Eco-Centre. All other rural transfer stations will continue operation as is.

At the Tuesday February 9th County Council meeting Council will be considering a fee structure for disposals at the Regional Landfill as well as at the Rural Transfer Stations. The proposal suggests no charge for bagged household waste less than a pick-up load in size, along with a minimum of $17.50 for a pick-up or trailer less than 8 ft. (based on an average of 250 kgs.) A more complete list of suggested fees will likely be available following Tuesday’s meeting.

First reading passed 

On Tuesday, January 26th Council passed 1st reading of a bylaw to include “Solar Farm” as a Discretionary Use in the Agriculture District A. The proposal was put forward by Blue Mountain Power Corp. and “would allow for Agriculture District A landowners a development opportunity to utilize a portion of land for electricity generation…rather than re-zoning parcels to industrial.” (Clearwater County agenda package, January 26, 2021)

Following the passing of 1st reading this will now proceed to a Public hearing before consideration of 2nd and 3rd reading. One might wonder what plans Blue Mtn. Power has.

Valentine Smiles  

What do you call two birds in love???  Tweet hearts!!

Do you think skunks celebrate Valentine’s Day??? Yes, they’re very scent-imental!!

Coming Events: 

NO REGULAR MEETING ON FEBRUARY 17, 2021 due to covid restrictions. We’ll see what March brings.

THE RESULTS ARE IN….

Here are the results of the survey that was part of the information published in the Western Star two weeks ago. 124 responses were received in just 10 days

CLEARWATER COUNTY TAXPAYERS’ ASSOCIATION SURVEY RESULTS RE MDP REVIEW

1. Prior to this information were you aware of the MDP review process?

Yes 35  No 78

2. If yes, how did you find out about the potential changes to the MDP? (Check all that apply)

Local radio 1  Social media 3  County website 5  County Newsletter 21

Local Papers 24  Clearwater County Taxpayers’ Assoc. 26  Friends 29

3. Are you satisfied with the amount of information that has been available about the proposed MDP? 

Yes 10  No 107

4. Are you satisfied with the opportunities you have had for input into the MDP review?

Yes 7  No 107

5. How do you think residents could better gather information and provide input?

In person meetings 98  Mail out survey 79  Social media/virtual meetings 28

6. Would you like to see the process delayed until open in-person meetings could be held?

Yes 112  No 5  Undecided 1

Comments: (Listed in order from highest to lowest number of comments.)**concerns with protecting agricultural land, **possible negative impacts with increased subdivisions, **transparency issues/lack of information or public input in the review process,**problem with relying on social media/virtual meetings for input, **concern with Direct Control Districts.

HUGE THANKS TO ALL WHO TOOK THE TIME TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY AS WELL AS OUR VERY SPECIAL SUPPORTERS WHO MADE PUBLISHING ALL THIS INFORMATION POSSIBLE.

We will be sharing this information with County Council as we work together for the common good. 

Clearwater County Taxpayers’ Association.

IN THE NEWS

By Marianne Cole

CCTA Welcomes New Board Member 

At our Annual Meeting on November 9, 2020 we welcomed a new member, Tim Plante from the Arbutus area to our slate of Directors. Tim operates Alhambra Vacuum service and is also on the local Blue Mountain Power Corp. Board. We certainly welcome a new, younger, voice to our group. Another change in the board was the movement of Helge Nome from Director to Vice President. Other positions remained as follows: President: Marianne Cole; Secretary: Susan Durand; Treasurer: Pat Butler; Directors: Al Gaetz, Jim Foesier, Larry Titford, and Jim Pearson. Another important decision made at the meeting was to change the regular meeting dates to the third Wednesday of the month. This will eliminate conflicts with holiday Mondays.

Broadband 

At the December 8th Council meeting there was significant discussion on matters related to broadband/improving connectivity in the County. In the end Council passed one motion to “approve the engineering of County wide fiber to the premises for 80% of the populated area within Clearwater County for grant writing purposes commencing with the rapid responses applications due January 15, 2021.” The engineering will provide more valuable information on the action and related costs of providing fibre optic cable to residences in a large part of the County.

A second motion “that Council approves the preparation and submission of a grant application to the January 15, 2021 Universal Broadband Fund intake deadline for a fibre construction project that includes backbone extension and fibre to as many premises as can be accommodated within the $5million maximum project size for Rocky Mountain House to Ricinus” was defeated. A couple of the points mentioned in opposition to the motion noted that it would be difficult for administration to adequately gather the necessary information for the grant application in such a short time, and that the extra staff time might not be positively used in light of the fact that the grant application is already over-subscribed, lessening our chances of receiving any benefit.

With the engineering information, however, we hope that we will be better prepared for further government grant funding as it becomes available.

2021 Budget 

Council met for two days of budget deliberations on December 16th and 17th. Highlights from the Capital Budget included a reduction of $8, 472, 205 (17.1%) from the 2020 budget ($49, 480, 186) to $41, 007, 981 for 2021. The proposed Operating Budget for 2021 could, on the other hand, see an increase of $3, 707,911 (6.5%). Interesting proposed reductions in this part of the budget included $44, 570 (8.3%) for councillor remuneration as well as reduced spending for the office of the CAO as well as agriculture. On the other hand increases are proposed for public works, corporate services, planning, and emergency services. It will be interesting to see what the actual 2020 numbers are when the audited statements are available later this spring. The question always remains as to how much our county income has been/will be reduced and what implication that has for taxes in 2021

MDP Review 

The process for reviewing our Municipal Development Plan has now been going on for almost a year. This is a document that sets forth the guidelines for land use and development for the next 10 years or more, and has the potential to impact each one of our county residents. The most recent draft was just posted on the County’s website on Monday, January 4th but a hard copy can be picked up at the County office. Because of Covid19 the office is closed to the public but you can call ahead and someone will bring you a copy to the door.

There are some very significant proposed changes to the current MDP, namely:

· More seemingly general ambiguous guidelines as the words “shall” have often been changed to “may”. (e.g. While Clearwater County prefers that industrial and commercial developments be located in a business park, they may approve such for outside a planned business park.)

· Overall reduction in recognizing the value of conserving agricultural land. The conservation of agricultural land has been removed as a goal in the natural capital section (where it was #1 in the 2010 document) and is not stipulated in the agriculture section of this current draft either.

· Proposed allowance of 3 separate titles per quarter, along with the potential for a 4th title. This means there could be up to 3 subdivisions per quarter AND there is absolutely no stipulation of size restrictions on the parcels to be sub-divided.

· Aggregate and resource extraction is proposed to be under a Direct Control District, meaning that County Council alone will be the decision maker for all such applications. This means that in the event of a decision on a development permit application that is unfavorable to either the developer or area residents, there is NO OPPORTUNITY FOR AN APPEAL. (See MGA, Section 641.4-a)

These are just some of the more troublesome guidelines in the new draft of the MDP and it is absolutely crucial that people become involved in expressing their opinion. Because of Covid19 restrictions the County has organized 8 “virtual” open houses starting on January 25th. This means that you can go on your computer, listen to a presentation and then ask questions. You can check Page 28 of the January 6, 2021 Western Star for all dates and times. Such an opportunity is better than nothing but it is hardly as effective as in-person meetings. There are many residents in our County that either do not have computers or have such limited connectivity that a virtual meeting is impossible. IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO AFFECT ANY RESIDENT OF CLEARWATER COUNTY IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT EVERYONE HAS EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO GATHER INFORMATION AND EXPRESS THEIR OPINION. THE PAUSE BUTTON MUST BE PRESSED ON THIS PROCESS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS OPEN MEETINGS ARE ALLOWED. WE URGE YOU TO CONTACT YOUR COUNCILLOR AND ASK FOR THIS PAUSE.

Thoughts for the new year

“There are better things ahead than any we leave behind.” C.S. Lewis “Learn from yesterday, live for today, and hope for tomorrow.” Albert Einstein

Up-coming Events

 Due to Covid restrictions being extended there will be no meeting on January 20, 2021. We hope for one on February 17, 2021 at 7:30PM at Arbutus Community Hall.

Board Members 

Marianne Cole, Helge Nome, Susan Durand, Pat Butler, Jim Foesier, Al Gaetz, Larry Titford, Jim Pearson, and Tim Plante.